Search for: "Ninth U S District Court" Results 1 - 20 of 612
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
BP PLC et al., Docket No. 18-16663, the Ninth Circuit vacated the district courts order denying remand and sent the case back to the federal district court with instructions to consider whether alternative grounds for subject-matter jurisdiction exist. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 10:58 am by Alan S. Kaplinsky
Appellant Seila Law had asked the Ninth Circuit to overturn the district courts refusal to set aside a Bureau civil investigative demand, arguing that the CID was invalid because the CFPB’s structure is unconstitutional. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 5:30 am by Kwan Loh
District Court for the Western District of Washington (the “District Court”) not to hear Trader Joe’s claim against Hallatt for, among other things, trade-mark infringement, dilution, unfair competition and false advertising. [read post]
31 May 2011, 8:20 am by Kent Scheidegger
  Yet again, not a single member of the high court thought the Ninth's judgment was correct. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 10:58 am by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) The Ninth Circuit panel: Pregerson, Paez, and a district judge sitting by designation. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 1:00 pm
The court went on to affirm the district court's grant of summary judgment in the defendant's favor on the UCL claim, citing Daugherty and Bardin. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 1:53 pm by Matt Cooper
The Court reversed the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which had found error in the district courts analysis. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 1:44 am
Capistrano Unified Sch Dist 538 F.3d 1261, 50 IDELR 181 (9th Cir. 8/19/2008), the Ninth Circuit held that the school district violated state law by limiting the time that a psychologist could observe the student's placement to 20 minute increments, the parents were not thereby deprived of a meaningful opportunity to participate in the IEP review process. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 6:47 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
At step two, the panel examined the record before Judge Boldt to clarify his intent, and concluded that the district court erred in excluding the disputed watersfrom the Lummi’s U & A. [read post]